Tuesday, March 03, 2026

History: Past auditor general reports on transport

A bit of history today - some past auditor-general reports on public transport in Victoria going back up to 30 years. 


* DDA

https://web.archive.org/web/20110315104833/http://www.audit.vic.gov.au/reports__publications/reports_by_year/2009-10/20090912_distrspt.aspx


* Management of major rail projects

https://web.archive.org/web/20110315102218/http://www.audit.vic.gov.au/reports__publications/reports_by_year/2009-10/20102306_major_rail.aspx


* Regional intrastate rail network

https://web.archive.org/web/20110315110512/http://www.audit.vic.gov.au/reports__publications/reports_by_year/2009/20090624_rail_network.aspx


* New bus contracts

https://web.archive.org/web/20110315110359/http://www.audit.vic.gov.au/reports__publications/reports_by_year/2009/20090624_bus_contracts.aspx

* Complaints against ticket inspectors

https://web.archive.org/web/20110315113135/http://www.audit.vic.gov.au/reports__publications/reports_by_year/2008/20080730_ticket_inspectors.aspx


* Rail Infrastructure maintenance

https://web.archive.org/web/20110315121742/http://www.audit.vic.gov.au/reports__publications/reports_by_year/2007/20070523_rail_infrastructure.aspx

* 2007 New Ticketing System

https://web.archive.org/web/20110315120035/http://www.audit.vic.gov.au/reports__publications/reports_by_year/2007/20071031_ticketing_system.aspx


* Rail safety

https://web.archive.org/web/20110315094753/http://download.audit.vic.gov.au/files/rail_safety_report.pdf


* 2005 Rail and tram franchising

https://web.archive.org/web/20110315094151/http://download.audit.vic.gov.au/files/ptfranchising_report.pdf


* 1999 Road construction

https://web.archive.org/web/20110315120034/http://download.audit.vic.gov.au/files/Road_Construction_1999.pdf


* 1999 Land use and development

https://web.archive.org/web/20110315115910/http://download.audit.vic.gov.au/files/Land_use_1999.pdf


* 1998 Moving from a system to a service

https://web.archive.org/web/20110315121219/http://download.audit.vic.gov.au/files/transport_reforms_1998.pdf


* 1998 Automated Fare Collection

https://web.archive.org/web/20110315120843/http://download.audit.vic.gov.au/files/Ticketing_1998.pdf


* 1996 Better Cities 

https://web.archive.org/web/20110315122659/http://download.audit.vic.gov.au/files/1996_SR45.pdf 

Thursday, February 26, 2026

UN 224: Five trips the Metro Tunnel and its timetable made better

Much communication since the full timetable of the Metro Tunnel went live on February 1 has understandably concentrated on easing the transition for regular passengers whose travel routine got changed. Along with introducing riders to the new destinations available such as around Parkville and Anzac stations. 

However there are certain other trips, possibly less obvious, that the Metro Tunnel has made easier. 

Enjoy this video which is about five of them. 



Are there other trips you found the Metro Tunnel has helped? Please leave them in the comments. 

Index to Useful Network items here

Thursday, February 19, 2026

Which stations most deserve a spruce-up?


From gleaming palace to urinal look-alike in just a few steps. That's the customer experience when switching trains from the sparkling new State Library in the Metro Tunnel to Melbourne Central in the City Loop.

Being a state icon whose facade every tourist photographs is no protection either - just check Flinders Street Station's dirt and dust despite the spending a few years ago. Nor is the dark, smelly and unaccountably managed Southern Cross much helped by its international, interstate and regional gateway role.

Currently Melbourne's transport leadership has a great culture of building new. But operating and maintaining have lower status. A billion dollar over-run for a construction project is shrugged off as an inevitability while every extra cent for improved maintenance and operations must be fought for.

The result is a haves and have not rail network. Not only in service levels (as I've discussed before with some lines having one-quarter the off-peak waits of others at certain times) but also in station presentation. There appears to be no prioritisations of the latter with regards to customer experience with high passenger throughput stations like Melbourne Central some of the dingiest. 



It may be that the biggest contribution that the Metro Tunnel can make to the network is to inspire better from our existing assets. But only in the next few months - if these are not adequately maintained then they might slip into the Southern Cross syndrome of modern stations also falling into disrepair. 



Don't believe anyone who says it isn't possible. Some apologists for mediocrity say that we cannot expect more as many assets are old. But that's a lie. Southern Cross station is not that old, being a 2000s product. Dandenong is barely a decade older. Yet both are in poorer state than stations of similar age elsewhere.


Costs of better upkeep are not necessarily high either; a deep clean every few months, graffiti removal and a few licks of paint (possibly applied during one of the many rail shutdowns) can all make a big difference. As can the simple act of changing light globes on platforms and in lifts.  


A colour temperature near the middle of this range is most appropriate for areas where people need to wait such as train station concourses and platforms. 


Because of demarcation due to excessive task balkanisation (an efficiency-killing aspect of outsourcing originally conceived to divide the workforce and thus union influence) we even seem averse to issuing otherwise idle station PSOs with long brooms to remove dust. Not everyone loses though; toilet manufacturers are one of outsourcing's biggest beneficiaries as each job classification at a site gets their own (with the public sometimes getting none). 

Busiest 20 stations rated

Annual metropolitan train station boardings for 2024/25 are documented here. The Metro Tunnel will likely mean some new entrants while the order of some existing stations will change. The top 20, starting with the busiest, in 2024-25 are below: 

Flinders Street **
Southern Cross **
Melbourne Central **
Parliament ****
Footscray ***
Richmond **
Flagstaff *****
Caulfield **
South Yarra ***
Box Hill **
Glenferrie ***
Dandenong **
Oakleigh *****
Huntingdale **
Sunshine *****
Ringwood *****
Clayton *****
Craigieburn ***
Springvale ***
North Melbourne ***

If you were looking at what stations to do up first that delivered a better experience to large numbers of people you would likely start with this list. Plus a couple of others considered to be major hubs like Broadmeadows (with an international connection) and Frankston (large catchment precinct). 

The stars are an 'off the top of my head' rating based on multiple amenity and fitness for purpose criteria. These with three stars and below have a strong need for multiple improvements including (but not limited to): 

* Accessibility
* Air quality (no fumes)
* Changes between trains possible entirely within paid area/more connections between platforms
* Deep clean
* Extra entrances to station to increase walking catchment
* Information (that works) and wayfinding (including multimodal maps)
* Lighting (more and softer though attention to colour temperature)
* Repainting and general maintenance
* Shelter and shade
* Seating
* Better toilets and drinking taps

Should some of my star ratings be different? Are there other high priority stations that need a revamp? Your thoughts are appreciated and can be left below.