Does the bus run from Dandenong to Narre Warren with a backtrack via Belgrave? Or are there separate trips from Belgrave? And can one arrive at any location on the route with an assurance that there will be a bus soon (or even in the same week)?
The first indication that all is not what it seems comes when you look at the stops. There are many between Belgrave and Belgrave South but only a few on the seat and legs. The timetable gives more an indication. More on that later.
To put you out of your
misery, the 697 proper is basically a Belgrave Station to Belgrave south bus.
It’s topical to talk about it on Tuesday as this is one of the days that one of
its weekly extensions (to Dandenong Market via Wellington Village Shopping
Centre Rowville) operates. The other
extension runs on Thursdays to Fountain Gate Shopping Centre. Return trips
operate from both destinations just after lunch.
Hence the 697 performs
multiple roles. The first and main role is to link the Belgrave South residential
area with the station and shops at Belgrave. The other roles involve providing
weekly connections to a major market and a major shopping centre.
The latter, to
Fountain Gate, involves a one-seat ride. Slightly further away but likely still
visited by Belgrave South people is Knox City. This involves a complex
bus-train-bus or bus-bus-bus trip involving the 697, Belgrave train (or 693
bus) and finally the 732 to Knox City. This is because all local buses from the
south and east (eg 695 & 697) terminate at Belgrave Station with none
offering through service to popular local destinations. There is however a price to be paid for 697’s
one-seat ride as you’ll see later.
Timetable
The 697 hasn’t had
much of a service upgrade in years. It missed out on the ‘minimum standards’
upgrade that rolled out 7 day service to many bus routes about 15 years ago. Hence
it only runs 5.5 days per week with no Saturday afternoon or Sunday service. There
is however service on most public holidays (mornings only). This is due to the
route adhering to the standard of a Saturday timetable (no matter how dated or
unsuitable) applying on public holidays.
Monday to Friday service is from roughly 6am to 7:30pm. Peak service, at every 20 to 25 minutes, is surprisingly high for a quiet fringe area ‘coverage’ bus route. Buses are timed to take 10 minutes each way so this can be achieved with one bus on the route.
The weekday interpeak timetable is unusual. Mostly it runs to a 30 minute frequency. This is also unusually good for a low usage fringe area route and meshes with trains. However it is not consistent with some 60 or even 70 minute gaps.
Saturday service is available
between approximately 8:30 am and 12:30pm only. An uneven 70 minute (approx.)
interval is offered apart from the first two trips which are about 40 minute
apart. The short span makes the bus suitable for morning shopping trips to
Belgrave but not much further due to the travel times and transfer penalties
involved. In cases like a trip to Knox City you would struggle to make the last
return bus even if you caught the first unless the trip was very brief.
Below is a screenshot
of the timetable. A curiosity is the relationship between the weekday shopper
extension trips and the regular Belgrave-Belgrave South trips. In particular it
shows two Tuesday trips departing at 9:45am. One goes the normal short route to
Belgrave South. The other goes almost the way there, missing the Morton Rd
stops. This is to retain directness for the Dandenong Market trip. The Tuesday return trip has a similar pattern
but the trips are a couple of minutes apart up until Belgrave where they arrive
simultaneously (due to different scheduled run times).
History and usage
The outer eastern areas around areas like Belgrave was already quite highly populated before WWII, though then as separate towns on main roads and around stations (that are typically adjacent). Population growth has been much more gradual than in other areas such as in the outer west, north and south-east. In the outer east postwar growth was higher in places like Croydon, Bayswater and Boronia than Belgrave.
However Belgrave has long had rural type bus services. Some like the 695 operate at surprisingly high frequency, even exceeding some suburban routes. As for the 697, service goes back nearly 90 years with a route from Belgrave South to Upper Ferntree Gully that was cut back to Belgrave in 1962. However there was a Narre Warren and Dandenong connection in the 1950s. The 1978 network map has the Belgrave - Belgrave South route similar to now but with no Dandenong or Fountain Gate extension showing. 1992's map however shows the Tuesday Dandenong extension.
The 697 attracts about
15 passenger boardings per bus service hour on weekdays (numbers from 2018).
This is somewhat below average for Melbourne buses (around 20). Saturday usage
is less again at 11 boardings per hour.
This lower than
average usage can likely be attributed to relatively low population densities
and less favourable demographics for buses compared to other parts of
Melbourne. The significant transfer penalties for any destination apart from
Belgrave could also be a factor as passengers must change for even local trips
to places like Ferntree Gully and Upper Ferntree Gully.
Conclusion
I previously discussed the local bus network here. I suggested that it needs a radical shake-up with simpler routes, less duplication and easier access to Knox City. Other nearby routes such as 694, 695 and 699 are also often confusing and poorly used.
As for the Dandenong Market and Fountain Gate trips, how useful are they given their weekly frequency? Is there a place for weekly trips at all in a metropolitan area of over 5 million? Would it be better to simplify routes with consistent daily service to Dandenong or Fountain Gate/Narre Warren with connections from other routes? Or would there be most benefit by sticking to timetable upgrades like Saturday afternoon 697 service? Comments are appreciated and can be left below.
Other Timetable Tuesday items are here
1 comment:
Extending 697 to run on Saturday afternoons and Sundays is obviously the first thing that needs resolving.
There is a clear missing link between the outer east and south-east that extending 697 south to Fountain Gate (and ideally Narre Warren for rail connection) full time could resolve. This would cut the current travel time on public transport (via Scoresby and Dandenong) by at least two-thirds, from over 2 hours to under 45 minutes.
Three buses should allow a useful half-hourly service in peak times (one coming from the existing timetable) with two buses off-peak at 40 min intervals (in conjunction with an upgrade of weekday interpeak trains on the Belgrave Line to 20 mins).
Having a full time link to Fountain Gate would make the Friday-Sunday 695F to Fountain Gate redundant. Given weekend 695F trips effectively double-back some 15km over the regular 695 to Clematis before splitting off, this should provide some significant savings towards the 697 extension.
The unique 695F section along Bailey Rd in Cockatoo West can be better served by alternating every 2nd 695 trip away from Avonsleigh, including on weekdays when currently there is no service. These trips should be allocated their own number with the alternating sections getting hourly services in peaks and 80 mins at other times.
663 (towards Monbulk) and 695 (towards Gembrook) would be timed to coordinate with 697 at Belgrave wherever possible, with Gembrook buses also downgraded from 30 to 40 mins interpeak (further savings).
Politically you might not cancel the weekly Dandenong Market trip completely but savings could be found by consolidating it with the sperate 695 market bus to Emerald, with Emerald residents having to travel into Belgrave to catch the 697 market bus (with a timed connection.
The fate of the 838 & 840 would also need consideration with these changes - personally I'd consolidate the two as 838 to give the hamlet of Upper Beaconsfield more options. Those going into Pakenham could change to an upgraded 926 or train services at Beaconsfield. The role of 838 between Berwick and Fountain Gate might also be questioned.
Post a Comment