Thursday, May 01, 2025

UN 201: New 30 minute bus corridors for Springvale and Keysborough


Optimising bus networks is like a game of pick up sticks. Trying to shorten, extend or divert one route has implications for many more, especially if your budget is limited. The number of interdependencies can change what was a minor network change involving two or three routes into something that affects 10 to 20 across a large region. 

Greater Dandenong hasn't had an implemented full scale bus network review for decades. Though there was a large mostly unimplemented review done about 15 years ago. And there were more recent smaller reforms to some Dandenong routes. Notably (i) routes from the Cranbourne area in 2016, (ii) Endeavour Hills a few years later and (iii) some Keysborough changes involving deleting the old 815 to form the new 816 and boost services on 813 a bit later again. 

Mostly though it's been in the too hard basket. The tendency instead has been to layer any new routes over an existing unchanged network, such as happened when Route 709 was extended from Waterways to Noble Park via Keysborough. And the area's last bus change, the major upgrade to Route 800 along Princes Hwy, was a timetable initiative only. 

Nearly a year ago I discussed 7 day upgrades for the next lot of Dandenong area buses. Largely based on patronage productivity the 802, 804 and 815 were the three most deserving, edging out routes 844, 857 and 885. Upgrades are possibly just by finding $1-2m per year to run the existing routes 7 days. Alternatively if you want higher frequencies for a given amount of money you could merge some routes. I discussed merging routes 802, 804 and 862 (5, 6 and 7 day per week respectively) into two 7 day routes back in 2020 here. For this reason I won't cover them here. 

As common as missing Sunday service is low frequency. Dandenong has a lot of routes operating at every 60 minutes or worse, even during peak times on weekdays. Examples include routes 811, 812, 814, 848 and 857. More make the list when weekends are considered including 813, 824, 828, 844, 850, 862, 885, 890 and 892.


Just like with the 802/804 there's a choice between just throwing more service kilometres on existing routes or thinking about how the network could be simplified to get better value from what's spent. Doing both would be even better with wider benefits. Especially in a catchment like Greater Dandenong where you can put on a bus almost anywhere and expect above average ridership. 

Approaches to network simplification

The Greater Dandenong bus network map shows several areas where routes are closely spaced or (even better for this exercise) overlapping. These may indicate opportunities to adjust routes so that you have fewer but they run more frequently. In Dandenong's case I wanted to test whether it was possible for some of these to go from every 40-60 to every 30 minutes, at least on weekdays. 

The first exercise was drawing all routes that went through Dandenong (and some adjacent stations) to get a network route kilometre number. I then drew a more simplified network. That reduced the route network by about 70 kilometres without significant loss of bus stops. That more economic network would likely buy more frequency and/or operating hours on one or two of the reformed routes. The main trade-off involved would be that for some trips you may need to change buses. 

A more aggressive approach would have reduced network kilometres further. That would permit even higher frequencies. But then you're increasing walking distances to (say) 600 or 800 metres as opposed to 400 metres which has been a historical design aim. This has a higher justification in areas where buses are poorly used as patronage versus coverage trade-offs are more acute.

But it is perhaps harder to argue in places where even indirect routes enjoy well above average usage and a strong case exists for more network service kilometres overall (ie not robbing Peter to pay Paul). Most of Greater Dandenong falls in that category. Still, if you're in a time that balks at spending $5m on a local bus network upgrade but routinely accepts $5b cost blow-outs on major projects then you may have to consider trade-offs to get anything done with buses.   

It's also useful to map key network issues before reaching for the felt pens. For example noting corridors that need more service and others that may have too many infrequent routes overlapping. A non-exhaustive map is below (click for a better view). 


The reason why I say it's non-exhaustive is that it does not include weak termini (these exist on routes 814, 816, 844 and 848) or low weekend frequencies (on nearly every route). It is however still useful to identify opportunities for improvement and how you might resource them. 

Limited service points 1 and 7 as well as the significant overlap at 9 are addressed in my look at 802, 804 and 862. Thus they do not need to be covered here. 

Studying the remainder can help with some tentative ideas, especially if there are synergies between the green and red circles. Two really jump out:

* 811/Heatherton Rd

This is only every 60 min, even in peak times. The portion between Springvale and Dandenong gets high usage, justifying at least a 30 minute service. See 3 on map. 

Route 811 is paired with Route 812. From Brighton they head east together providing that 30 minute service as far east as Dingley. Then they split off with 812 going to Dandenong via Keysborough. Route 812 contributes to significant overlap between Dandenong, Keysborough and Dingley at 11, 12 and 13 on the map above. 

The top map below gives a rough schematic of the existing 811/812. I used this to illustrate an east-west service divide. That is Brighton got double the frequency of Heatherton Rd despite the latter having higher social need, greater bus patronage propensity and strong actual usage. 



How to fix this? Most obvious is to make 812 like 811 so it runs along Heatherton Rd to give it double the buses (on weekdays) between Dandenong and Springvale (closing the inequality with the Brighton end). The result is that the routes become identical except in Dingley where they diverge to retain coverage.

You'd want the routes to be of similar length to keep gaps between trips at an even 30 minutes at both ends. Springvale, Dandenong Markets, Dandenong Hospital, Chisholm TAFE, Oasis Pool and Heatherton Rd itself are just a few of the destinations that would benefit from this corridor getting a frequency upgrade from every 60 to every 30 minutes.   

Rerouting the hourly 812 from Keysborough removes a bus from a part of Corrigan Rd that needs it. That can be addressed by a minor rerouting of 824 (which at every 40 min is more frequent). Most other parts of Keysborough are near Route 813 which would also gain frequency as discussed next. There are different ways in which the sections around Springvale South/Dingley can be revised with this important to permit Route 814 upgrades also covered next. 

The above 811/812 change is like a Stage One. Legibility could be increased further if the 811/812 was consolidated into a single route with some other solution found to maintain coverage in Dingley Village but that's a lower priority than what's discussed next. 



* 813/814 Keysborough, Springvale and Mulgrave areas

Both are indirect but popular routes serving catchments well away from trains. 813 is currently every 40 minutes on weekdays and 60 minutes on weekends. 814 is hourly on its limited hours Monday to Saturday morning timetable. Both overlap and treat a portion of Springvale Rd as a through stop. That's important as it relieves pressure on the often overcrowded Route 902 for short trips.

It would benefit the 902 (eg faster loading) if 813 and 814 run at a 7 day frequency attractive enough for many of the large numbers of passengers who alight at Springvale to prefer those over the 902. 20 minutes 7 days per week would be the ideal but even a 30 minute service would be preferable to current irregular frequencies. The rest of this item will assume 30 minute frequency on weekdays.  

As you can see under 'existing' below, 813 and 814's indirectness means that no one would ride either route end to end. Also 814's Springvale South terminus is weak. Both characteristics make it easier to simplify the route as may be needed to increase frequencies on key portions. 



Where can routes be shortened or merged to allow the higher frequencies needed? There are several candidates, including: 

(i) Spring Rd, Springvale South. Currently a weak terminus for the 814, this could be served by rerouting 811 or 812. This delivers 7 day service to the area and frees up the Springvale end of the 814. This is numbered 6 on the Dandenong bus issues map. 

(ii) Police Rd, Mulgrave. This is a busy road that with few pedestrian crossings is hard to cross. Four routes operate along sections of it including 631, 813, 814 and 848. Arguably that's excessive. Scope exists for the 813 and 814 to be merged to create a more frequent 7 day route. See 10 on the issues map. 

(iii) Noble Park North to Dandenong. Route 814 follows this path from Waverley Gardens via Jacksons Rd. It overlaps the 848 closer to Dandenong. Apart from the 814 not running evenings, Saturday afternoons or Sundays a major issue is that it does not connect Noble Park North to its nearest station at Noble Park. The trade-off here is that weekday and Saturday morning frequencies at some stops closer to Dandenong are reduced unless Route 848's frequency is increased. 

(iv) Route 885 between Springvale and Glen Waverley is another part-time route. It gets good usage but adds little unique coverage. There may be scope for most of its stops to be served by an upgraded and rerouted Route 814. This would preserve the Springvale connection and deliver new 7 day service to some stops. This is an example of a trade-off common with bus network reform when aiming for higher frequencies.  

A concept network 

There are many ways to start to untangle what is a complex and infrequent network. Below is one concept. As with any idea it has pros and cons. But this needs to be weighed against the substantial issues of the current infrequent and often part-time network. 


Alternatives to the 816 northern extension for Noble Park North could involve retaining the 814 in the area but terminating it at Noble Park station. Or extending the 631 south to Noble Park station, providing a new Monash University connection. Both have merit but involve more service kilometres than extending the 816 which, like the 814 it would replace on Jacksons Rd, is only hourly (though it has better peak service and runs 7 days). 

The above concept has two points where road works would be needed to permit through movement of buses via a shorter route. This adds implementation complexity. This may be avoidable if less direct routes were taken. However following such a 'path of least resistance' also denies the high returns possible from making an initial capital investment now to save future service kilometres and cut trip times.    

Network frequency changes

Shown below are the frequency changes resulting from the above described network. It assumes that 811/812 retain their current 30 minute combined weekday frequency (but shifted to Heatherton Rd) and the modified 813 and 814 get upgraded to every 30 minutes. 


The biggest gain is along Heatherton Rd between Springvale and Dandenong. Not only is this a currently very underserved bus corridor (only hourly, even in peaks) but route density is very low, partly due to difficult road geometries. The revised network halves gaps between buses to 30 minutes with improved connections to major destinations at Dandenong and Springvale. 

Also gaining frequency are neighbourhoods in Springvale, Keysborough and Noble Park with the 813 upgrade which cements its status as a key route in the area. Parts of Mulgrave north of Police Rd also have improvements from the 814 rerouting, though there is a trade-off involving the 885.

Currently both 813 and 814 overlap on a section of Springvale Rd, going from at least the shops to the Princes Hwy junction. The 40 and 60 minute frequency results in 2.5 buses per hour with uneven intervals. Through-routing with Route 813 trips forming the 814 (and vice versa) changes this to 2 buses per hour but with an even spacing. This 30 min clockface timetable should be more appealing. 

As with any economical network there are trade offs. The main one is between Dandenong and Eastlink. There the 814/848 corridor is reduced to just the hourly 848. Much of this area has alternative 30 (and even 20 minute) routes including 800, 811/2, 813 and 850. However if this is still an issue scope exists for the 848 to have trips added. 

Changes in route lengths

Reducing network kilometres is key to frequency increases assuming no additional resourcing. On the network mapped above the following apply:

* 816 has a large increase due to its extension to Waverley Gardens (replacing part of 814)
* 811, 812 and 824 overall have a small increase due to alignment changes. 
* 813 and 814 have large decreases as they are made shorter with overlaps removed
* 885 also has a large decrease as it is entirely replaced by a rerouted 814 

Overall route kilometres across the seven routes drops from about 150 to 132 km, ie about 11%.

The 60 to 30 minute frequency boost on Heatherton Rd between Dandenong and Springvale is already accounted for as both routes would continue to run hourly with Heatherton Rd gaining the 812. 

Hence the returns from that 11% can go almost entirely to boosting the 813 and 814's frequency. 

Let's say the aim was a 30 minute frequency on weekdays, ie 2 buses per hour. Boosting the 813 from 1.5 to 2 buses per hour is a 33% increase while the 814 uplift from 1 to 2 buses per hour is 100%. Both are much bigger than our 11% so initial hopes for much are dim. 

But recall that 813 and 814 were made shorter. By finishing at Springvale 813 loses about 6.5km while 814 is 10km shorter by no longer operating between Waverley Gardens and Dandenong  and Springvale South. The pair is around 45% shorter, making it cheaper to upgrade than if this was attempted on the full length of both routes. 

Cost and implementation

You could reverse engineer timetables to work out exact changes in annual service kilometres. It is most unlikely you'll get an answer that makes it free. But it is very likely that a network like this will give a result that is relatively cheap, especially relative to the amount of extra 30 minute frequency added.

Further enhancements that boost weekend service and operating hours would also be cost-effective in view of the more economical, fewer route kilometre network than exists currently.

On the con side, this represents, by current DTP standards, a large bus network reform. Other cities achieve bigger bus network reforms quicker but existing processes here might entail 3 or even 4 year time-lines (unlike say level crossing removals where we do them quicker than others). Thus governments wishing to reform buses have a trade off between value for money, implementation speed and work effort with two but not three being readily possible.  

Conclusion

Concepts for more frequent buses in Springvale/Keysborough have been presented. They are 'oily rag' type upgrades that nevertheless involve significant frequency gains on routes that need them. 

Comments are appreciated and can be left below. 

Read other Useful Network items here

Monday, April 28, 2025

2005 flashback - Melbourne on Transit turns 20


Today marks 20 years since I started the Melbourne on Transit blog.

Starting with this test message, it has grown to something that a few people in transport read. 


Some things projected or advocated in it even happened. I am optimistic that more will in the next few years. This has to be as the policy pendulum, now weighted by infrastructure-incurred debt, swings back towards improved asset utilisation through better service as is the core theme here.   

Melbourne on Transit's history falls neatly into thirds of 6 to 7 years each. 

I started it early in my transport career, although I had been in transport advocacy and passenger information circles years before that. 

Things were different then. Back in 2005 transport was so institutionally fragmented that you could work in one area of transport and write about the others without piquing your boss's consternation. Chances are they watched TV rather than a computer screen at night so wouldn't have seen it anyway. 

The online environment

Social media was then less a part of popular culture, although there were very active niche websites. People with something (and sometimes nothing) to say in transport populated forums such as Bus Australia and Railpage in huge numbers. Others had blogs and websites with the still going Vicsig being a pioneer. Forums featured participants ranging from teenage gunzels, future rail fantasists, nostalgic curmudgeons all the way up to Secretary Jim Betts (who was then defending the government's record against critics such the PTUA's Paul Mees).  

The first substantive blog post, a day later on April 29, 2005, had links to four websites that I considered significant. Two of those four links still work. That includes Zen and the City Loop (an independent page needed to explain the then and now still complex City Loop as officialdom considers it too hard) and what is now the Australian Timetable Association. One of the broken links went to Rob O'Regan's unofficial Metcard website. An outstanding treasure of information about transport ticketing, notably Metcard, the Wayback Machine still has an archived version of it here. The other link was to the City Circle Tram, broken due to various renamings and rebrandings that plague official websites.

Public transport in 2005

What was public transport like in April 2005? Ticketing was Metcard, trains were Connex and the fancy Southern Cross Station roof was under construction. Branding still reflected the previous era of franchising and fragmentation, though Metlink, commenced the previous year, was starting to assert a network identity. 

Catching buses was a mugs game in 2005. There were some green shoots of renewal in 2002 with pilot SmartBuses on Blackburn and Springvale Rd running. But overwhelmingly if you wanted to catch a bus on a Sunday or after 7pm you couldn't as timetables were so limited. It wasn't until the Bracks government's 7th year in office, in 2006, that serious inroads were made into that with the launch of the Meeting our Transport Challenges plan (or MOTC). 

Perhaps compensating for the Melbourne-centrism of the Kennett years, the early Bracks years were regionally focused. A major emphasis was revitalising rail to Geelong, Ballarat, Bendigo and La Trobe Valley under the Regional Fast Rail program. Regional rail was returned to government management while metropolitan rail remained with continually rebranding private franchisees. 

As wouldn't become critical until later, state interest in developing metropolitan public transport was low with some 1999 promises scaled back or broken. The government launched the Melbourne 2030 planning document in 2002. Like the private rail franchises then in effect, there was an ambitious patronage goal but no serious funded transport component despite its own public forums calling for this. Instead it was the collapse of these franchises that forced the government to pay renewed attention to metropolitan rail.

Making the franchisees viable, preserving conditions for staff and reunifying the network were key priorities.  Service reform, including higher frequencies, was off the menu. So were major train and tram network extensions, with the public told in 2005 not to expect any for 15 to 20 years. Thus the official position when Melbourne on Transit started was that trains and trams would continue to operate but not significantly expand, essentially limiting their reach and role.  

Then metropolitan rail usage started surging, forcing punctuality into free fall. The government, hoping these times would pass, was caught with its pantographs down, with Minister Kosky famously saying that she didn't want to run a rail network. These times did not pass, the Labor government acted too late and so lost the 2010 state election. More about the Bracks and Brumby era here

A consequence of that election was institutional change in public transport. Both the Greens and Coalition supported some form of integrated public transport authority. Labor preferred to keep the current fragmented arrangements with a Department of Transport doing the planning, operators doing the running and Metlink, as a technically private operator-owned company, to do the information, marketing and revenue allocation. To the side there were other agencies like Victrack to look after rail assets and the Transport Ticketing Authority to implement the new myki system. 

The Coalition won and set up Public Transport Victoria as a 'one stop shop' incorporating Metlink and part of the Department of Transport. Not everyone in the old department found new roles in the new PTV so it was an unsettling time for some. However public transport's political importance, especially metropolitan rail, had risen. Exciting investments in infrastructure, some funded by the previous government, were to come on-line. Some lines were getting much needed 'greenfield' timetables with Frankston the first to get a 7 day 10 minute service. And we were on the cusp of a rail reliability revival that reversed nearly a decade of decline from 2003.  

Hiatus

My professional role was changing around then, with a move from data to planning. Plus there were other transport blogs starting that I (incorrectly) thought would be enduring. So in January 2012 I stopped posting but left it online.

Here I acknowledge blogging stalwarts Marcus Wong and Daniel Bowen who kept readers satisfied uninterrupted, before, during and after this period. Their steady fare got supplemented at times by others who would appear, delete then reappear.   

This hiatus marked the second third of the blog's history. The first third never saw very high readership. But what there was seemed to hold up for at least four years after I stopped posting. Followed by a slow decline from about 2016, around the time government transport priorities switched to infrastructure which this blog never covered in detail. 
 

Revival

The most recent third is apparent from the readership surge from January 2019. Others suggested I resume the blog but I was initially lukewarm. Then, following some trial posts on a Facebook group, blog posting resumed after another professional change gave new freedoms. That first item highlighted Melbourne's declining public transport service per capita, something that would become an increasing focus. The revival also saw weekly features looking at timetables and networks in more detail. 

Thanks to you readers views rose strongly until the pandemic. They levelled off then since resumed rising (though I would ignore the spikes). Lifetime impressions (at least since 2011) stands at 1.43 million. 

A staple matter covered has been bus network reform. Official interest in the rhetoric (if not yet the practice) of this rose with the launch of Victoria's Bus Plan in 2021. It is possible that, a bit like Infrastructure Victoria, Melbourne on Transit has assisted in creating a propitious policy climate for this, even if what gets implemented is less ambitious and at a slower pace than one might like.   

I have increasingly covered rail service matters. Other things being equal, if I write an item about trains it will get more readers than one about buses. This might reflect trains' generally higher usage than buses in Melbourne. Or the heightened public interest given major projects, notably the Metro Tunnel, are starting soon. 

Service relationship with infrastructure builds

I have (too?) rarely covered major infrastructure builds. But I do want to discuss the intersection between infrastructure, planning and service. 

A continual theme of public transport planning in Melbourne (regional Victoria gets a better mix) is that we build infrastructure but rarely add enough service to make the infrastructure truly worthwhile for more than a few hours a day.

It's as if there's a need to justify projects with business cases that seek to deliver positive benefit cost ratios in order to attract funding. That may include a scramble to find low cost / high benefit network reforms or service upgrades that make BCRs better. Even reaching for things that could have been done at any time prior.

Then once the project is funded the need to substantiate benefits may vanish as the cost is sunk and there is no turning back. Also if project costs exceeds budget then wider benefits network additions, even if relatively cheap, risk getting discarded, narrowing benefits to less than envisaged.

As an example we could have had a heap of off-peak rail frequency upgrades (and even some greenfields peak timetables) without level crossing removals. Yet we got the (often still desirable) level crossing removals but rarely substantial all day service increases.

This downplaying of off-peaks has continued even though the pre-pandemic trends (that have only since intensified) have made off-peaks the main game. Which is actually good news for those who wish to see a generally useful all-week network that maximises its returns from assets.  


Service prospects for the Metro Tunnel

Right now is a particularly interesting time as we have yet to see what service levels we'll get from the Metro Tunnel and related train timetables. I discussed this here and here . 

Having seen only limited metropolitan rail service uplifts (a) before level crossing removals and (b) after level crossing removals, will the Metro Tunnel be the project that finally brings home the goods on service? We don't yet know. 

Thus with not even basic frequency specifications on this and related line timetables being public yet, any speculation or analysis, even if on a scrappy blog, finds an audience. Including by the news media, with the most recent being a major article this month


Most popular

Now about you. What have been your all-time favourite posts over the years? Here they are, starting with the most read first. 

1. Sydney versus Melbourne - who really has the better transport? 

Proof that everyone loves click-baity titled city by city comparisons. Even before their CBD metro opened the winner was Sydney. Though with our extensive rail system, trams and bus suitable suburban road grid, Melbourne can excel if it cared more about 18-20 hour a day all week frequency and more direct bus routes. 

2. The state capital with the worst public transport

Another inter city comparison but in more detail. The answer is NOT Melbourne, despite what some pessimists claim.   
 

Long term rail shutdowns can be confusing and official communication can sometimes be patchy. This guest post by Craig Halsall filled the gap for winter 2023 Frankston line passengers. 

4. Who runs transport? A look at DTP's leadership team

The Department of Transport and Planning is a mystery to outsiders. And people love reading about people. So when I put together what I could find about the backgrounds of the department's top executives it was an instant hit. DTP insiders appeared as eager to read about their bosses as the rest of us. Though as you'd expect, none left comments.

That item came out June last year. There have been some movements since. However redoing it today would be harder. As discovered on April 1, the executive organisational chart vanished from DTP's website earlier this year, making it a closed season for open governance. And restructures may be looming as the government seeks to cut costs.  

5. The Future Frequent Network Melbourne needs

When you already have a lot of public transport infrastructure, like Melbourne does, service becomes king. A recurring theme here over the last 20 years is that we could be doing a lot better on service. This popular item presents a multimode frequent network that would make public transport a truly go (almost) everywhere choice across Melbourne. 

6. Twelve lessons from Adelaide's attempted bus network reform

I talk about bus reform a lot here. It can indeed deliver large benefits. But it's also important to learn from failures. We had our own in 2015 when a new government scotched the Transdev Greenfields network. But far more dramatic was the case of Adelaide in 2020. Their complete rework of the bus network came to nothing, even costing the minister his political career. Re-read that item for a list of traps to avoid when reforming a bus network. 

7.  How will the Metro Tunnel benefit your line?

With the Metro Tunnel slated for opening later this year, this March 2024 item has only become more topical. Both Herald Sun and The Age had comprehensive stories this month. Their gist is that we might not get the service uplifts envisaged in the Metro Tunnel Business Case from 2016 (ie pre-pandemic). The government line is that the timetables were still being written and we should just wait and see.     

That's it for now. Thanks for all your reading and comments. 

Thursday, April 24, 2025

UN 200: Box Hill to Cheltenham - Making a start on the 733 SRL SmartBus



Can we bring forward some of the benefits of the Box Hill - Cheltenham Suburban Rail Loop? 

We can. And for very little if we continue to be open to the idea of improving buses along its corridor.  

The state government set the ball rolling when it funded modest upgrades for Route 733 in the 2022 state budget. This boosted frequencies on the busiest part of this route, notably between Box Hill and Clayton. This has been very well received by passengers with strong patronage growth since starting nearly two years ago.

Thanks to these improvements the 733's Box Hill - Monash section now gets weekday interpeak buses every 15 minutes, a halving of waits from the previous 30 minutes. Saturdays improved from 40 to 30 minutes while gaps between Sunday buses shortened from 60 to 40 minutes.

However weekend waits are still longer than what should be a premium bus route, particularly on Sundays. As a taste of what it could be, premium bus routes in Sydney, Brisbane and Perth typically run every 10-15 minutes on weekends with longer operating hours than our 733.  


Another issue with the timetable upgrade was that as the 15 minute weekday service finishes at Monash station. That's not as useful as it could be if this extended to Clayton Station. Clarinda; a substantial residential area with no local train station, also didn't get the frequency upgrades it deserves. 

Part of the reason for this is that, good though they were, the budgeted upgrades were timetables only - not routes. There was no network reform that could have delivered 'greater good' network benefits. For example simpler routes, better train connections and increased 7 day frequencies. That's desirable to get the most service for the least money. 

There's many good reasons to upgrade buses in many parts of Melbourne. But Route 733 has one other ace up its sleeve. Because it is the route most similar to the Suburban Rail Loop, strong usage of that strengthens the SRL's case.

And the state government really needs a confidence-boost for the SRL right now with some querying its capacity to fund, especially if federal sources fall short or costs exceed those envisaged. Any reduced confidence potentially undermines the third funding source - that of 'value capture' - if developers walk away.  

An extended upgraded Route 733

Next Wednesday marks two years since the successful first round of improvements to Route 733's frequency. So today let's talk about how a much needed second round might be done and funded

If you, like Treasury, believe 'charity begins at home' in the sense that departments should look for internal savings before asking others for money, DTP could start with identifying potential offsetting savings in the existing network by reviewing the usage and coverage of local buses. 

That includes Route 733 itself, especially its Clayton to Oakleigh section. Part of that overlaps the more frequent Route 703. Another part operates about 300-400 metres parallel to Warrigal Rd which is served by the frequent 903 orbital. Oakleigh itself is served by numerous buses to Box Hill and Monash. Splitting the 733 at Clayton gives scope to continue it south rather than west, hence permitting a Southland/Cheltenham connection. 


Bus route 631 traces its history back to the acrimonious bus contracts dispute of the late 1980s. When the government lost the legal proceedings it started two long and duplicative bus routes across the eastern suburbs with Quinces as the operator. Route 634 was later merged into other routes but 631 remains today as a remnant of a previously longer route that once ran to Mitcham. 

Few passengers from 631's southern half remain on the bus beyond Monash University, giving potential to join this with the 733 at Clayton. Helpful to such a join is that Route 733 south of Monash operates every 30 minutes interpeak weekdays, matching the current Route 631 interpeak frequency. On weekends the 631 operates every 40 min Saturdays and 60 min on Sundays, ie similar to the Route 733 before it got upgraded.  

Route 704 is a quiet east-west route between Oakleigh, Clayton and Westall. It overlaps other routes in Oakleigh but offers some unique coverage in parts of Clayton. Service is every 30 minutes peak and 40 minutes off-peak (including weekends) which is relatively high for its usage. It retained its Oakleigh alignment on Burlington St despite being overlapped by the 742 and later (in 2006) the 900 SmartBus. This may generate opportunities to allow a potential southward Route 733 extension as mentioned above.  

Existing network

The three existing routes discussed are mapped below. 
 
Potential revised network

The above suggestions lead to the network below. 733 becomes predominantly a north-south route while 704 and 631 are roughly west-east routes. All stops lost to the 631 get the 733 instead, sometimes with increased frequency. The 733's rerouting would remove stops from Cameron Av and Golf Rd, which as noted before are close to the 903 on Warrigal Rd. However Golf Links Av would gain the rerouted 704 as a replacement for 733. 


Careful observers will note a southern extension to Cheltenham station. This is because Southland bus interchange lacks short and simple access to Frankston line trains. Affecting routes such as the 631 and 767, this reduces connectivity between the south and south-east. To mitigate that the extended 733 runs to Cheltenham though a dearer option could run it west to Sandringham via stops nearer to Southland station on Bay Rd.  

Route 704 would remain a similar length to now (around 10km long). 631 drops from about 22 to 7 km while 733 has a net gain of 6 km to go from 23 to 29km. The three routes combined drop about 8km, from 54 to 46 km, with negligible coverage loss. 

It is this reduction in route kilometres that could buy higher frequency without adding buses or driver hours. In this case my pick for the higher frequency would be (a) between Monash University and Clayton Station (retaining the current 4 buses per hour of 631 and 733 but more evenly spaced) and (b) between Clayton Station and Clarinda. Effectively this makes more of Route 733 a frequent service. And it could enable higher weekend frequencies. Overall there is a more even distribution of service as service kilometres move from Centre Rd to the currently underserved southern part of Clarinda (whose route 824 runs only hourly on Saturday afternoons and Sundays).  

Does this network solve all the problems with buses in the area? No it does not. Thus I regard it as an interim rather than an ultimate. Existing issues this network does not tackle include:  

a. Slow travel speed between Clayton and Southland/Cheltenham due to indirectness
b. Confusion on Bourke Rd where buses in opposing directions (incl 824) go to Clayton
c. Weak eastern terminus of 704 (Waverley Gardens would be better but this requires a Mulgrave/Springvale area review to simplify overlapping bus routes on Police Rd)

In addition the reformed Route 631 is quite short. It could be extended to Noble Park Station via Jacksons Rd. Again this would need a Mulgrave/Springvale area review to avoid duplication with 814. 

Given the remaining issues is it still worth doing? That depends on the extent it can permit increased frequency, particularly on Route 733. That's covered next. 

Potential Route 733 frequency gains

Below are some network frequency diagrams for bus routes 631, 704 and 733. Each of the thin lines represents one bus per hour. Thus two lines equals a 30 minute frequency and four lines a 15 minute frequency. A single thick line is a 40 minute frequency (ie 1.5 buses per hour). Lengths of routes (or route segments where frequencies vary) are multiplied by the number of buses per hour. This gives a rough idea of service resourcing per route.

Each diagram has a total on the bottom right. It doesn't mean a lot by itself but is useful when comparing options (which appear directly under the existing cases for each day of the week). Peak periods have higher frequencies and evenings lower frequencies so the use of interpeak frequencies should be a reasonable average. All three routes have roughly similar spans of hours, making comparisons based on frequencies alone reasonably fair.  

Monday - Friday


Above is existing for the three routes discussed above. It does not include cases where there are overlaps involving other routes. If these were counted then you'd have 6 buses per hour on a part of Centre Rd (in conjunction with 703) and 5 buses per hour on part of Bourke Rd (with 824). However these will not be evenly spaced so maximum waits will be longer.   

Below is a potential revised weekday interpeak pattern as mapped before (see 'Potential revised network'). The extended Route 733 delivers a 15 minute off-peak frequency from Box Hill to Clarinda, representing a large gain for the latter. Southland and Waverley Gardens retain their existing 30 minute frequencies, while 704's remains at every 40 minutes. After all that the total is 127km, ie slightly less than existing.   


A potential variation is to reduce 704's interpeak frequency to hourly (due to low usage). That may free up service kilometres to (a) commence 631 from Clayton rather than Monash, (b) run Route 733 later at night and/or (c) redistribute service kilometres to weekends. 

Saturday


Above is existing for Saturday. Route 733 frequency drops from 15 to 30 min on the busiest section but remains at 30 minutes on the quieter Oakleigh - Clayton section. Both Routes 631 and 704 are every 40 min.

I will present two potential Saturday network options. 

The first upgrades frequency to every 20 min between Box Hill, Mt Waverley, Monash, Clayton and Clarinda. Thus would be a major upgrade on a busy corridor that justifies it. Like on weekdays every second trip would operate to Southland/Cheltenham. The 40 minute frequency is not attractive but retains the current frequency of the existing 631. The total kilometres (94) is very similar to current (93.5). This is achieved by reducing Saturday on the quiet Route 704 from 40 to 60 minutes. Much of its catchment is near the higher frequency 703 or 903.   

The second potential Saturday option retains 733's current 30 minute frequency but delivers a benefit for Clarinda, Southland and Cheltenham by having a consistent two buses per hour running on the entire route. It actually involves less service kilometres than now, although that gap can be narrowed by adding Route 733 evening trips, extending Route 631 to start at Clayton and/or boosting 704 frequency.  

Overall the first option is a likely to benefit the largest number of passengers. It would also represent a service breakthrough in it being the first Box Hill and Monash area bus route to operate a consistent 20 minute frequency (or better) on Saturdays. 20 minute Saturday service already operates on routes elsewhere in Melbourne, including 465, 472, 893 that do not serve as many busy destinations as the upgraded 733 would. And, unlike the existing 30 minute frequency, it would harmonise with the 20 minute Saturday service on the Glen Waverley line.  

Sunday 
 

The existing Sunday service pattern (above) probably demonstrates the greatest mismatch between demand and service provided. The busy Route 733 drops to only every 40 min, ie the same frequency as the quiet Route 704. 631 becomes the lowest frequency of the lot at only hourly. A major rationale of the simplified network presented here is to enable a better Sunday service on the 733. 

Both options below improve Route 733 Sunday service. The first is quite similar to the first Saturday option and involves more resourcing than now. But there's some big gains, notably the 20 minute frequency between Box Hill and Clarinda. Southland/Cheltenham would get a smaller improvement, going from every 60 to every 40 minutes. It has the 631 remaining at every 60 minutes which would also be the 704's frequency. 
The second Sunday option is cheaper, with only slightly more service kilometres than current. It delivers a flat 30 minute service for all of the extended 733. Not as good as every 20 min but it's still an improvement on the existing 40 minutes at the Southland end. 631 gets boosted from 60 to 40 minutes with this paid for by reducing 704 from 40 to 60 min. 

Like with the Saturday option, the first Sunday option is likely to be get the most patronage due to the strength of Route 733 usage. It does however have a higher cost than present though it may be possible to claw some of that back through the slightly reduced weekday hours. 

Project sequencing

The successful already implemented 2023 service upgrade is effectively Stage 1 of this. 

Stage 2 is what is described here. The opex would be somewhere between between negligible and low (even if you went for the 20 minute Sunday option). The capex is also minor as although there's changes to bus routes there are no new stops or termini. 

Stage 3 would be a small network tidy up in the Clarinda area to make Route 733 more direct to Southland/Cheltenham. Concepts for that here and here. That's needed as travel times, even with the Stage 2 upgrade, are too slow on this portion. Speeding access to the Monash precinct from the Cheltenham area would strengthen the case for improved frequency over the whole route, not just Box Hill to Clarinda. This would entail both capital and operational spending but would bring legibility and connectivity benefits. Potential also exists to do this in tandem with abovementioned Springvale/Mulgrave network improvements. 

Stage 4 would be further frequency uplifts, 24 hour weekend service, bus priority, upgraded shelters and passenger information to make it clearly a premium service. The gold standard version of this stage would be all week 5-10 min frequencies and limited stop expresses operating each day until late.  

Conclusion

An upgraded 7 day Box Hill - Cheltenham bus is both possible and essential given the success of recent service upgrades.

The next logical step in this could be trivially cheap if assisted by modest network reform.  

While no claims are made it of it being an 'ultimate' it could still represent the next step towards a genuinely premium SRL SmartBus. 

The patronage success of the recent modest Route 733 upgrades should give added confidence that a further upgrade is a journey worth embarking on, especially given Stage 2's very low cost.

Especially as a tangible means for the government to build goodwill towards the Suburban Rail Loop by bringing forward some of its benefits. 

Other Useful Network items are here