But parts of the network are pretty good, with tourists awed by the size of our train and tram systems.
Every route is equal - how Transport Victoria maps
However, although charged with network marketing, DTP through its Transport Victoria brand has a habit of allowing the good parts of the network be lumped with the bad parts. 'Use the journey planner' is their normal refrain, with no thought given to expanding would-be users' ideas of what is possible first.
Especially for buses, which have the highest patronage growth potential of the three main modes yet low social licence (as revealed in internal Bus Plan documents tabled in parliament), fixing these perceptions requires (i) changing reality by chopping out the bad bits through bus network reform and (ii) accentuating the positive through good information and marketing.
DTP/Transport Victoria presents buses more or less the same, regardless of how useful or useless they are in reality. This is exacerbated by our wide variation in bus service levels. The Knox example below displays the main road 901 (every 15 min weekdays, 30 min weekends over long hours) at equal prominence to the 757 (8 trips on weekdays, none on weekends). The former is useful for many trips, the latter for only a few.
Frequent routes are more useful - some independent maps
Fortunately there are independently-produced frequency maps for Melbourne's public transport that start where TV's local maps finish.
But today's topic is to introduce the amazing new Melbourne frequency map developed by Adam Bain. Available at ptmapmelb.com it is based on midday weekday frequencies. Switchable layers exist for 10, 15, 20 and 40-60 minute frequencies. It is inspired by similar maps for Seattle and Miami.
Just like with Melbourne, Seattle had a disconnect between what was important for passengers and information that was published by the siloed transit bureaucracy. Creating a gap filled by independent map makers and activists.
A substantial growth, particularly in the west and north comes when 20 minutes is selected. Apart from the outer-east this substantially completes the Metro train network, Melton and Geelong V/Line and adds many bus routes. But you will still see large populated areas without coverage. Most prominent gaps include Point Cook, Melton, large parts of Brimbank, Wollert, Epping, Thomastown, Mernda, the entire outer east, Greater Dandenong, Pakenham and Frankston.
The final two boxes are for limited service or FlexiRide routes. These routes are common in parts of the outer east (eg around Knox) eg 681, 682, 757, 758 and more. Although developed around 30 or more years ago these areas never got a full bus network then and still don't have one today. If an area has a lot of complex peak, limited service or FlexiRide routes it is likely to be crying out for bus network reform, as in the Reservoir and Knox examples below.
The frequency finder
I said before that Adam's map was based on midday weekday frequencies. That's a problem because weekend frequencies in Melbourne can vary between 0.25 and 1.5 times weekday interpeak frequencies with Sunday service sometimes a fraction of Saturdays.
Frequencies may also vary across the day between peak, interpeak and night time bands. Buses (especially) lack consistent operating hours so services may not run when you need to travel.
However help is at hand through the companion Frequency Finder for trams and buses.
Frequency Finder lets you find frequency by route by day of week and time of day. There's also a handy span guide and a map that changes colour (to indicate frequency) by line selected.
I deliberately selected a complex route (824) to test whether the graphic would show the more frequent Moorabbin part of the route (every 20 min) differently to the Keysborough end (every 40 min). It did.
However the frequency finder is limited to a single route and not a corridor. Thus overlaps like 250/251, 411/412 or 811/812 will not be shown as higher frequency here unlike they are on the map.
Conclusion
This map and the accompanying frequency finder will encourage people to see the Melbourne public transport network differently with service have and have not areas really made apparent. This will make it a useful planning and advocacy tool.




