Today I check catchment population versus off-peak service levels for middle and outer suburban stations across Melbourne. Again there are big disparities. Popular stations on less served lines get just one-ninth the service relative to population versus stations on the best served line.
Both exercises support the view that Melbourne's Metro network lacks funded and implemented master timetable planning that aligns all day rail frequency with objective criteria such as usage or catchment population. Instead historical inertia and political factors have been most powerful in determining the service that suburban stations on electrified lines get.
If you don't want to read tedious station by station comparisons just scroll to near the end for the pre and post Metro Tunnel animated frequency map. There's an action plan to fix this right at the end.
Approaches to planning suburban rail frequencies
There's at least three approaches to deciding how frequently suburban trains should run. The transport authority (which in our context includes the state government and DTP) could:
a. Operate a decent minimum service level (say every 15 min) on all lines across the week. That has the virtue of simplicity - rock up at any station at any time and you'll have a train soon. The idea that supply (in this case frequent service) is a major driver of public transport demand so it should be high, especially given that most railway costs are fixed and the marginal cost of off-peak frequency is low. This is
basically what Sydney and Perth do with minor imperfections (Sydney not quite all stations, Perth not after 9pm). Both networks are good patronage performers relative to their size and historically.
b. Operate a low network-wide minimum service standard (eg every 30 min) and run only the densely populated section of the network network frequently all day with most of the rest frequent in peak times only. This is based on the idea that public transport usage is demand-led so it is futile to give everyone a good service all day. Brisbane does this. It's a failure with low patronage relative to both network size and (even more so) rail employee numbers.
c. Similar to b. above but have an even lower minimum service standard (eg every 40-60 min) with history or electoral politics determining which stations get all week frequent service. This is what Melbourne has allowed to happen. That wording is deliberate because my hypothesis is that metropolitan electrified rail service planning is a spasmodic set-and-forget affair that lacks an annual funded continuous improvement program that targets the highest needs first.
Weak patronage rebound for Metro network
While usage of Melbourne's large rail network remains substantial, BITRE reports that it has been the slowest to bounce back in patronage since the pandemic. Contributing factors likely include frequent construction shutdowns, our high working from home rate and long waits at the very times travel activity has grown fastest due to a lack of service reform.
There has also been a structural shift in that we have effectively paused rail electrification to growth suburbs with V/Line diesel trains increasingly taking on the growth area suburban transport task in the west and north. Unlike Metro, V/Line does have a strong and continuous program of proportionately large frequency improvements with these often being (honoured) election promises. The same BITRE report says that V/Line has the fastest growing patronage of Australia's regional rail operators.
Subsequent comments here apply most to metropolitan electrified services.
Method
Today I'll look at the 5km population catchment of metropolitan stations relative to the service it gets.
I used the Population Around a Point website by Tom Forth to calculate station population catchments. The service is midday weekday trains per hour. That off-peak measure is good for many reasons including off-peak frequency being a better proxy of a line's usefulness for diverse trips all day, the growing relative importance of off-peak versus peak travel and off-peak's higher patronage/service elasticity.
So that these circles (mostly) capture only a single train line and do not have a tram option, I picked a ring of suburban stations about 20 to 40km out from the city. Most circles contain several stations but these are on the same line so typically get the same waits between trains.
Below are the two most contrasting examples. Williams Landing on the Werribee line has a high catchment population but gets few trains while Carrum on the Frankston line has one-fifth the population but has twice the train frequency. Together that makes over a 9:1 disparity in service per person in Carrum's favour.
Williams Landing is a comparatively new station, opening in 2013. The Werribee line on which it is situated has generally had a fixed 20 minute midday service for much longer. This compares to the Frankston line which also ran every 20 minutes until it was upgraded to every 15 minutes in the 1990s and every 10 minutes in the 2010s. On the population side, Williams Landing's catchment has gone from mostly open space to heavily populated in the last thirty years.
Today's 9:1 disparity is directly due to the less populated line getting lots more midday service while the more populated line stayed stagnant regarding midday service.
Least to most served stations by service / population
I've already discussed the extremes of Williams Landing (lowest service per head) and Carrum (highest service per head). This is my list with twelve more. Each person represents 20 000 people within a 5km radius of the state station. Below is a list of all fourteen stations I reviewed with comments below each one.
Werribee line. Discussed above. Top ranked due to its high population density with only a basic 20 minute midday frequency on the Werribee line. Laverton to Werribee portion serves a fast growing catchment.
Sunbury line. Similar story to Williams Landing with high population but only basic midday service. Middle Footscray to St Albans section densifying, Watergardens is the nearest station to some growth areas. Metro Tunnel timetable will soon double its midday frequency to 10 minutes to provide a service that better reflects usage.
Pakenham line. Like stations in the west and north this outer south-east station combines a high population catchment with a 20 minute service midday service. Station is beyond the split at Dandenong which enjoys a 10 minute midday service. This service
commenced in July 2014 with midday trains previously only every 15 minutes to Dandenong and every 30 minutes on the branches. Should gain from Metro Tunnel with frequency improvements most likely evenings and Sunday mornings (not midday).
Geelong line. Busiest V/Line station apart from Southern Cross. Growth area catchment. Midday trains every 20 minutes which is sometimes better than some peak period gaps. This is a new station on a new section of line that did not exist before 2015. Timetable has larger evening gaps than Werribee line and late morning starts on weekends.
Lilydale line. Not particularly densely populated but this and the Belgrave line has some of Melbourne's longest gaps between midday trains with Adelaide or Brisbane style 30 minute headways. Waits are already longer than at more distant stations such as Melton and Geelong with Sunbury to surpass Croydon's service levels when the Metro Tunnel opens. Midday weekday service levels have been unchanged for many decades though
weekend trains got improved to every 20 minutes in 2012. This make the Lilydale line (along with Belgrave) alone in having a better midday weekend service than weekday service for no rational service planning reason except inertia. More details on the
More Trains Melbourne's East Facebook page.
Belgrave line. Everything said above for Croydon station applies to Boronia on the Belgrave line. Both lines lag the similarly configured Pakenham and Cranbourne branches which enjoy a higher (20 min) interpeak weekday service.
Mernda line. Has the typical 20 minute frequency common on northern and western suburban lines as has remained for decades. Line is continuously populated in Melbourne with stations to the south having densifying catchments and stations from Epping to Mernda with growth area catchments including Wollert (which will soon be getting upgraded feeder buses). Line has no infrastructure limitations preventing it going to every 10 minutes. Liberals promised to introduce a 10 minute midday service on the (then) South Morang line in 2014 but lost government. There have been negligible timetable upgrades in the decade since with evenings and Sunday mornings remaining at every 30 and 40 minutes respectively.
Werribee line. Major centre with growth area catchment. See Williams Landing above.
Craigieburn line. Another continuously populated line this is another northern suburb line that has lacked significant service uplifts for many decades with its 20 minute midday headway seemingly stuck in stone. Possibly now Melbourne's most crowded, the line serves growth areas north of Craigieburn. Metro Tunnel Business Case envisaged midday service would improve to every 10 minutes but government appears to have walked back on this, with 2025 budget funding aiming only to get maximum waits down to 20 minutes from their current evening and Sunday morning 30 to 40 minutes.
Cranbourne line. Large growth area catchment with many residents hoping for an extension to Clyde. Beyond the branch at Dandenong. Midday 20 minute service
commenced in 2014 with this being an upgrade on the previously 30 minute intervals. Everything said for Narre Warren also applies here.
Hurstbridge line. Inner portion of line to Eltham has a similar basic service level as Mernda, including 20 minute midday headways. Similarly its timetable has been largely stagnant over many years.
Ballarat line. As part of the V/Line network, Melton has enjoyed a stronger trajectory of service improvements than most Metro lines. That includes midday weekday services improving from approximately one to three trains per hour. Weekend services have also improved but not by as much with the most recent improvement from every 60 to every 40 minutes. The line serves one of Melbourne's fastest growing corridors and significant further investment in improvements is envisaged.
Pakenham/Cranbourne line. One of a string of very busy station between Caulfield and Dandenong. Currently enjoys a 10 min midday service with likely evening and Sunday morning gains after the Metro Tunnel opens. Had a 15 minute midday service prior to the 2014 upgrade. Arguably now justifies a 5 min midday service which would be assisted by its (now) lack of level crossings.
Frankston line. Discussed extensively before, Carrum enjoys suburban Melbourne's highest train service level with trains consistently every 10-20 minutes at all times but in early hours of Sunday morning. This was not always the case with a steady stream of upgrades basically doubling service since the 1990s, assisted by the line having several political swing seats. Bayside placement and inland Green Wedge contributes to catchment population of less than 60 000. But even doubled population would retain Carrum's spot as Melbourne's highest served station for its distance from the CBD.
Discussion of results
There is no connection between a metropolitan train station's catchment population and how frequently its midday trains run.
The most important factors appear to be (i) population distribution of 30 or 40 years ago and (ii) political priorities including the distribution of historically marginal and safe seats.
Inertia in metropolitan (though not regional) rail frequencies has been king for much of the last decade. The threshold to trigger a metropolitan service upgrade (even the
cheapest types) is high. You basically need middle class commuters left behind on platforms to get a substantial change to train timetables, such as occurred about 10 to 15 years ago.
The 2025 state budget may represent a turning point with exactly the required lower cost upgrades being funded along with Metro Tunnel operations. That will deliver a major all week frequency upgrade for Watergardens, the second ranked station here. And at least Williams Landing, Narre Warren, Werribee, Broadmeadows, Cranbourne and Springvale should get some gains at other times. However several more like it will be needed before we can say it represents a decisive change from the 'infrastructure over service' stance that dominated this government's first decade.
The bigger picture
Here's a map showing the Metro network with the most and least amount of frequent service across the day. Black lines have no frequent service, brown lines are frequent in peaks only while green lines are frequent in the off-peaks too. It alternates between existing pre-Metro Tunnel and what I understand will be the service levels post-Metro. Click map for better view.
Frequent is defined as every 15 minutes, a common threshold and base frequency for Australian transit systems. The thickest green lines are frequent seven days. Everything is daytime only as no single route or line in Melbourne has consistently frequent evening service (although some overlaps do).
You can see massive service disparities across Melbourne. In a nutshell the west+north get a peak only frequent service while many lines in the east+south enjoy a frequent service all day on weekdays and sometimes also weekends (
more here). It's a network of haves and have nots, as then Opposition transport spokesman David Hodgett
said in 2016.
The Metro Tunnel timetable will give the west its first ever individually frequent all week line (to Watergardens). Craigieburn and Upfield (who see their maximum waits reduced from 40 to 20 min) and Werribee (extra peak trips) also get handy gains. But the overall distribution of who gets all day frequent service remains very skewed. Want this fixed? Keep reading!
Potential 'Big Service' Metro upgrades
Existing high usage and high catchment populations are both good reasons to boost train frequencies at midday and other times. What are the best lines to start with?
1. Belgrave/Lilydale lines - every 10 min to Ringwood, every 20 min Belgrave & Lilydale
On the basis of cutting the longest waits first and being the cheapest to do, a Belgrave/Lilydale timetable rethink could be a good starting point. Key priorities for a Burnley group greenfields might include 20 minute maximum waits for Belgrave and Lilydale, a 10 minute maximum wait at Ringwood and simplified peak timetables with fewer stopping patterns.
However this doesn't fix the east-west divide, which needs the next steps listed to address.
2. Craigieburn line - every 10 min midday
Craigieburn line passengers pay the same fare as Frankston line passengers yet have double the waits, half the service and more crowded trains with higher unique section line ridership. The Metro Tunnel's business case from 2016 was based on the Craigieburn line operating every 10 minutes. This need remains today with its catchment population growing strongly, exacerbated by limited V/Line service at Donnybrook. Scheduling work may be simpler than a Burnley group greenfields timetable so there may be potential for this to be done first.
3. Werribee line - every 10 minutes midday
Though it has fewer stations, Werribee is another strong contender for better midday service. The line also serves a growth area. An upgrade would take some stress off the under pressure Geelong line at Wyndham Vale and Tarneit, especially if weekends used the express line like weekdays do.
4. Mernda, inner Hurstbridge and Sandringham lines - maximum waits cut from 40 to 20 min
A package of low budget evening and Sunday morning upgrades that replicate what the 2025 state budget funded for Craigieburn and Upfield. Sandringham would be especially cheap since it requires a handful of trains added per week. Mernda and Hurstbridge (to Eltham) upgrades are best done simultaneously as part of a Clifton Hill group package, which if split could see Sunday mornings and evenings until at least 10 pm done as the first phase.
Due to relatively simple scheduling and the few extra trips needed the government may wish to make this first priority to provide early and widely spread benefits on lines long neglected.
5. Mernda and inner Hurstbridge lines - every 10 minutes midday
Doubling of daytime service to reduce waits from 20 to 10 minutes. Serving a growth area the Mernda line is the most important but a decision may be taken to deliver similar to part of the Hurstbridge line as part of a Clifton Hill group upgrade. A 10 minute frequency would make train travel more popular in densifying inner areas where passengers must currently choose between slow frequent trams or faster but infrequent trains. It would also encourage bus reform and speed access to La Trobe University (via the existing 301 shuttle).
Other off-peak frequency upgrades not discussed here but which could be desirable are those associated with the Upfield, Glen Waverley, Melton and Geelong lines.
See other Timetable Tuesday items here
